Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption free essay sample

When comparing the novel and the film of Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption by Steven King there are many similarities. The film follows the novel plot very closely in many aspects of the book. The similarities found in the film and novel is character portrayals, key scenes and overall messages. The film accurately captures the essence of the novel. In both the film and the novel, Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption, the characters are portrayed in a very similar manner. The first character that was well represented was Andy Dufresne. I could see why some of the boys took him for snobby. He had a quiet way about him, a walk and a talk that just wasn’t normal around here. He strolled like a man in a park without a care or a worry in the world. Like he had an invisible coat that would shield him from this place. We will write a custom essay sample on Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page † In both the film and the novel, this was how Andy’s fellow prison mates perceived him as. In addition, Hadley was portrayed as a very harsh and strict man. â€Å"Your only problem is going to be how many bones you still got unbroken. You can count them in infirmary†¦ We’re throwing this sucker over the side. (King, 45) In the film he was also portrayed as the same character with the same characteristics. â€Å"You eat when we say you eat. You shit when we say you shit. And you piss when we say you piss! † Likewise, Sam Norton was a â€Å"biblical man† who was also cold and stern. â€Å"No one had ever seen him crack a smile. He had a thirty year pin from the Baptist Advent Church of Eliot†¦ made sure that each incoming prisoner had a New Testament. † (King, 56) In the film, his characteristics were exactly the same as the book. â€Å"I believe in two things: Discipline and the Bible. † All in all, the characters in the novel and film were portrayed in the same way. Secondly, the main messages in both the film and novel were captured in the same way. The first theme that is apparent in the film and novel is imprisonment and isolation. â€Å"These walls are kind of funny. First you hate ‘em, then you get used to ‘em. Enough time passes, gets you to depend on them. That’s institutionalized. † This was an apparent theme because most of the prisoners in Shawshank became so dependent on the daily structure within the prison that most of them were scared of the outside. â€Å"Twenty days on the grain and drain train for Andy down there in solitary. † King, 67) Solitary was a form of punishment frequently used in both the novel and film. On the other hand, hope was the most prominent message portrayed in the novel and film. â€Å"†¦I hope† (King, 107) hope was found in many various parts of Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption, such as, the hope to be free, hope to survive and so on. â€Å"Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies. † Another theme that is very obvious in Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption is crime. Crime is found all throughout the film and novel because the setting takes place in a prison. Tommy Williams came to Shawshank in 1965†¦ Cops caught him sneaking TV sets out the back door of a JC Penney. † Every crime that was committed in the novel and film stuck to the same details and explanation, making both the novel and film very similar. â€Å"I committed murder. I put a large insurance policy on my wife†¦ then I fixed the brakes of the Chevrolet coupe. † (King, 15) Given these points, the director of the movie included all of the same messages and themes that were in the novel. Furthermore, the film was so similar to the novel that most key scenes were word for word. One key scene, being Andy’s murder trial, seemed to be directly taken out of the novel. â€Å"Since I am innocent of this crime, I find it decidedly inconvenient that the gun was never found. † In this scene, the dialect is the same for both the novel and the film, for example, â€Å"It’s neither convenient nor inconvenient. Only the truth. † (King, 24) Equally important, Andy’s escape scene was captured similarly in the film when compared to the novel. â€Å"Geology is the study of pressure and time. That’s all it takes really†¦ pressure†¦ and time†¦That, and a big goddamn poster. Andy spent years on end working away at his escape hole in the novel and the film; Andy knew what it took because of his knowledge in geology. â€Å"Ripped the poster from the wall†¦ and revealed the gaping, crumbled hole in the concrete behind it. † (King, 87) Lastly, when Andy meets tommy, tommy realizes that Andy is innocent and he kn ows who actually committed the murders. This is another scene that plays out the same in both the novel and the film. â€Å"It’s my life. Don’t you understand? IT’S MY LIFE! † in the film Andy begs Warden Norton to understand his situation and pleads that he is innocent. He began refreshing Norton on the details of the crime he had been imprisoned for. Then he told the warden exactly what Tommy Williams had told him. † (King, 64-65) in the novel Andy hopes that Norton will listen to the information he has heard and that Norton will be understanding, but instead Norton shut him down. As shown above, the key scenes in the novel and film have the same details and context. In conclusion, the film Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption by Steven King portrayed the novel in a very similar way. It does so by portraying the characters, key scenes and messages in similar ways in both the novel and film.

Reconstruction dbq free essay sample

However, in n effort to discredit the Republican Party, he only made a fool of himself, (famously known as Johnnys Swing Around the Circle) and helped the Republican Party win 2/3rd of the seats in Congress, which gave them the majority to easily override Johnnys vetoes. As a result, the Republicans could aid African Americans and put into place the Reconstruction Act Of 1 867, which was much more successful than Johnnys presidential reconstruction. In fact, Congress efforts were so effective that the South felt the need fight Republican dominance.For example, bulldozing, using physical violence as a means to discourage black men from voting, was extremely successful. In short, though reconstruction (especially presidential reconstruction), did have its limitations and was not a complete success, it was a step in the right direction. Lincoln overly generous Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, also known as the plan, was deliberately designed to make easy the process of absorbing the Confederacy back into the Union. We will write a custom essay sample on Reconstruction dbq or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page However, Radical Republicans, namely Charles Sumner and Thatched Stevens, did not think this was severe enough or actually secured freed slaves heir civil rights. They presented the Wade-Davis Bill, which made it harder for Confederate states to enter the Union, and gave less room for former Confederates to return to positions of power. Because Lincoln was more focused on healing the nation than punishing the Confederacy-?whom he believes never actually seceded, but instead were in a state of insurrection-?though, he pocket vetoed the bill.Radical Republicans thus feared that the South could start reverting back to its old ways unless they worked to learn their lesson the hard way. Radical Republicans initially found ore favor with the next president, Andrew Johnson, who at first seemed like he would be more vindictive towards the South with his New Proclamation of Amnesty. However, Johnson, as a tailors son who never fit into Southern high society, was vulnerable to be wooed by the South into doing reconstruction even more leniently than Lincoln did! He pardoned 1 3,000 ingratiating Southerners.What happened next was huge, and would violate the principles of the war that had just been fought. Former high Confederates were seated right back into Congress (just as Radical Republicans had feared), and they ride to ma intain blacks in slavery under another name: Black Codes. Because blacks were granted freedom by the 13th amendment and that could not be changed, Southerners took the next best step and limited blacks freedom with the Black Codes, which practically contradicted everything the Union fought for in the Civil War and kept blacks in a state of De facto slavery. Because blacks could not secure independent work, they found themselves sharecropping, or working under cash-poor landlords who provided housing, tools, and plant-seed, in return for 2/3rd of their harvest. However, this did not provide blacks with enough money to support themselves, and they became indebted to their landlords. In this light, reconstruction was extremely limited and hardly successful: Southerners bought Johnnys favor with flattery, voted former Confederates in Congress, and then those Confederates slyly re-enslaved freedmen under the Black Codes. Blacks were enjoying neither liberty nor civil rights.Another reason that presidential reconstruction was hardly successful was that Johnson continued to veto Congress bills. Not only was Johnson in new ties with the South, he was a racist Democrat. He rejected the Freedmans Bureau, (which supported blacks with medical care, education, food, and courts), with the claim that the lazy blacks would only grow more lazy. He rejected the Civil Rights Act of 1 866, which granted citizenship and civil rights to black men, on the grounds that such an act exceeded Congress authority, and that such a phenomenon would only create racial strife.However, Radical Republicans, joined by moderate Republicans, (who began to notice the pattern of Johnnys vetoes), overrode the veto. Republicans, realizing that blacks freedom was still in danger, presented the fourteenth amendment, which ranted citizenship and civil rights to all those who are born in America, as well as guaranteed life, liberty, and property which could only be denied through due process, and lastly, Congressional authority to enforce the amendment.Johnson, being a Democrat who saw the fourteenth amendment as being a violation Of states rights, convinced all Southern state legislatures, with the exception of his home state Tennessee, to not ratify the amendment. It is ironic that Johnson vetoed many bills and acts which were intended to grant blac ks civil rights in order to protect states rights. Johnson did not fight or the liberty of men; he fought for the liberty of states. He was racist, and he was a Democrat. At this point, it was up to Congress to make for some effective reconstruction.After Johnson humiliated himself in his Swing Around the circle and helped the Republicans gain 2/3rd of the seats in Congress, Republicans had the majority they needed to override his vetoes and start implementing laws that protected blacks. They enforced the Reconstruction Act of 1867, an entirely new plan of reconstruction to protect blacks, with the Bayonet Rule, by which Union troops deterred the oppression f blacks in the South. This was extremely effective. Blacks could now vote and hold office!In time, the presence Of the Republican party dominated Of the South, and blacks stood right behind them. Furthermore, the fifteenth amendment secured black mens right to vote (for the Republican Party! ). Congressional reconstruction was very successful and produced excellent results at first: extending universal male suffrage, disenfranchising ex- Confederates for a certain amount of time, requiring public schooling for blacks and whites, rebuilding infrastructure, and creating welfare programs or the poor. The South criticized the Bayonet Rule with the myth of Negro Rule, which claimed that naive freedman elected depraved black politicians who permitted interracial marriage, though. They were outraged at the dramatic changes taking place in the South. In this time arose the UK Klux Klan, led by Nathan Bedford Forrest. The UK Klux Klan murdered all Republican Party supporters in an effort to crush Republican dominance in the South and reestablish the Democratic Party. And though they were indicted as a result of the Force Act of 1 871, few were convicted. This would e a mistake; more should have been convicted.